Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
+6
Tayto.king
st1allstar
richvans
Unograle
LondonTurbo
gtirx2
10 posters
Page 1 of 2
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Now to the engine,this is the engine from my other thread rebuilt and ready to go in with a few minor tweaks.
Unknown possibly tipo/uno 1.4 cam 9mm in/ex lift
Stock mk1 vs stage 2 turbo dynamics
Engine finally in, intercooler clearance,and screamer pipe fail lol
Fuel pump
New fuel hose
Unknown possibly tipo/uno 1.4 cam 9mm in/ex lift
Stock mk1 vs stage 2 turbo dynamics
Engine finally in, intercooler clearance,and screamer pipe fail lol
Fuel pump
New fuel hose
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Santa pod retro show,ran 14.5’s and made 168bhp on the dyno.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXGdxs2OGLA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iXGdxs2OGLA
Last edited by gtirx2 on Sun Mar 03, 2013 7:45 am; edited 1 time in total
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Wow thats proper mint! and a lot of hard work
nice fuel pump cover
nice fuel pump cover
richvans- 4th gear
- Posts : 220
Join date : 2013-01-29
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Thanks mate,still needs a couple of bits of paint work sorting and a bit of rust on a door bottom but then its hopfully done,oh and maybe a clutch and gearbox swap
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Well I think this is the last of it to where it is at now.
I decided to change the head as it had a iffy valve guide which I thought I would get away with at the time,but things had changed since I first built it as at the beginning with the other car it started as a knock together and run it project which went pete tong
Anyhow in that time I had also discovered a ported head that the seller of the other car had talked about,I thought he ment it was one of the spare heads that came with the car and not the head on the engine at the time .
This head is in a lot better condition with new valve guides so happy days!
Once the head was off I also started to hatch a plan to try and get it to work on some larger 240cc punto injectors, as my car was always on/over the limit with the stock ones.
It turned out I was a lot further over the limit than I thought, as on closer inspection I found signs of det damage on a couple of the fire rings on the head gasket .
Luckly the damage was just limited to the gasket, but just shows how much I was pushing my luck,I knew it was lean but once the afr gauge was out of the car and see no evil hear no evil and all that I pushed it abit further than I should of .
Also from my first uno years back I was well and truly over its limits so part of me was just think my old car did not blow up (well it did once (my fault))and showed no signs of det when stripped so this one will be ok with less boost….wrong
Anyhow around the same time when sorting the parts I was going to use in the rebuild I happened to feel my cam and to my shock number 1 and 3 exhaust lobes were showing signs of wear even only after just 5k+ miles!
This is a completely different thread as to why this could of happened,but at the end of it I needed to sort it out .
I spent untold hours looking into camshafts uprated and standard ones, and also looking closer into the spec of the turbo I was using to try and work out what would suit me best,especially as I was planning on using the larger injectors.
Infact I was praying I could get away with the larger injectors at this point, as going back to the stock injector would mean in a very de tuned state to avoid what was happening before .
Anyhow I thought I had managed to grasp a reasonable understanding of cams and pretty much made up my mind on what I wanted and what i though would work best.
It was only the night before I was ment to pick up the cam that I relized all this quoted duration stuff was not how I thought it was,by this time I was almost to fed up to care lol and just wanted to get on so I just went with it and put my trust in the manufactuer.
At this time I had also been looking into why camshafts can wear like mine did, as I obviously did not want it to happen again.
There are so many reasons for this, but in the end I basicly came up with a plan and so far so good, I think
I will post in another thread at some point but basicly its not to cut corners (who me ),new shims or at the very least flip the old ones if unused on one side,oil choice,lube and a good cam bedding in session.
Next up was the cam timing,this was a headache,basicly I was trying to cut a corner
It was a fair way off to what it should have been according to the kent cam specs,could be many reason for this from head/block thickness,how true you tdc is on the crank etc or could even be due to that the cam is designed for a mk2 uno or punto gt which uses a different toothed cam pulley?
Anyhow after trying to get it right by redrilling a hole in a standard pulley I gave up and went back to kent cams and brought a verneir pulley.
Its possible but its so fine to get exactly right,I think you are working in a 8.57degree window on the stock pulley and to drill the center of the hole spot on especially in the smaller middle part of the pulley is very hard indeed.
You could elongate the hole to get it right but even I was not happy to do that
Once all timed up and happy and after much debating with unograle to which way the tensioner should go it was time to take it for a drive.
First impressions were hazey and the first run up the road was on stock injectors with a bodged throttle cable,basicly though on the stock injectors it was now getting dodgy lean by 4k!
At this point I am proper stressing as to getting these larger injectors to work!
All seems well though at the moment,not perfect by a long shot but a lot better/safer than the stock ones,it still goes lean but at about 6.5k now but no where near like before.
I will up date another time as to the rough afr’s its running and the small issue I have with the afm but that can wait.
Heres is a few piccys, and below is what i make of the changes that the cam and head have made .
I have had it out again tonight and I am pretty impressed tbh,it denfinataly feels different but in a good way,seems to gain speed a lot more effortlessly now,I am now just praying it don’t go pop
Head gasket damage,was not blowing or anything.
Kent cam (left) vs stock mk1
Inlet
Exhaust
Pulley
701 beige Injectors modified and using stock mk1 pintle caps
T3 style 1 bar actuator stolen from the gtir
Ported head
I decided to change the head as it had a iffy valve guide which I thought I would get away with at the time,but things had changed since I first built it as at the beginning with the other car it started as a knock together and run it project which went pete tong
Anyhow in that time I had also discovered a ported head that the seller of the other car had talked about,I thought he ment it was one of the spare heads that came with the car and not the head on the engine at the time .
This head is in a lot better condition with new valve guides so happy days!
Once the head was off I also started to hatch a plan to try and get it to work on some larger 240cc punto injectors, as my car was always on/over the limit with the stock ones.
It turned out I was a lot further over the limit than I thought, as on closer inspection I found signs of det damage on a couple of the fire rings on the head gasket .
Luckly the damage was just limited to the gasket, but just shows how much I was pushing my luck,I knew it was lean but once the afr gauge was out of the car and see no evil hear no evil and all that I pushed it abit further than I should of .
Also from my first uno years back I was well and truly over its limits so part of me was just think my old car did not blow up (well it did once (my fault))and showed no signs of det when stripped so this one will be ok with less boost….wrong
Anyhow around the same time when sorting the parts I was going to use in the rebuild I happened to feel my cam and to my shock number 1 and 3 exhaust lobes were showing signs of wear even only after just 5k+ miles!
This is a completely different thread as to why this could of happened,but at the end of it I needed to sort it out .
I spent untold hours looking into camshafts uprated and standard ones, and also looking closer into the spec of the turbo I was using to try and work out what would suit me best,especially as I was planning on using the larger injectors.
Infact I was praying I could get away with the larger injectors at this point, as going back to the stock injector would mean in a very de tuned state to avoid what was happening before .
Anyhow I thought I had managed to grasp a reasonable understanding of cams and pretty much made up my mind on what I wanted and what i though would work best.
It was only the night before I was ment to pick up the cam that I relized all this quoted duration stuff was not how I thought it was,by this time I was almost to fed up to care lol and just wanted to get on so I just went with it and put my trust in the manufactuer.
At this time I had also been looking into why camshafts can wear like mine did, as I obviously did not want it to happen again.
There are so many reasons for this, but in the end I basicly came up with a plan and so far so good, I think
I will post in another thread at some point but basicly its not to cut corners (who me ),new shims or at the very least flip the old ones if unused on one side,oil choice,lube and a good cam bedding in session.
Next up was the cam timing,this was a headache,basicly I was trying to cut a corner
It was a fair way off to what it should have been according to the kent cam specs,could be many reason for this from head/block thickness,how true you tdc is on the crank etc or could even be due to that the cam is designed for a mk2 uno or punto gt which uses a different toothed cam pulley?
Anyhow after trying to get it right by redrilling a hole in a standard pulley I gave up and went back to kent cams and brought a verneir pulley.
Its possible but its so fine to get exactly right,I think you are working in a 8.57degree window on the stock pulley and to drill the center of the hole spot on especially in the smaller middle part of the pulley is very hard indeed.
You could elongate the hole to get it right but even I was not happy to do that
Once all timed up and happy and after much debating with unograle to which way the tensioner should go it was time to take it for a drive.
First impressions were hazey and the first run up the road was on stock injectors with a bodged throttle cable,basicly though on the stock injectors it was now getting dodgy lean by 4k!
At this point I am proper stressing as to getting these larger injectors to work!
All seems well though at the moment,not perfect by a long shot but a lot better/safer than the stock ones,it still goes lean but at about 6.5k now but no where near like before.
I will up date another time as to the rough afr’s its running and the small issue I have with the afm but that can wait.
Heres is a few piccys, and below is what i make of the changes that the cam and head have made .
I have had it out again tonight and I am pretty impressed tbh,it denfinataly feels different but in a good way,seems to gain speed a lot more effortlessly now,I am now just praying it don’t go pop
Head gasket damage,was not blowing or anything.
Kent cam (left) vs stock mk1
Inlet
Exhaust
Pulley
701 beige Injectors modified and using stock mk1 pintle caps
T3 style 1 bar actuator stolen from the gtir
Ported head
Last edited by gtirx2 on Wed Mar 13, 2013 11:41 am; edited 1 time in total
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
I have held back abit to give my conclusion on this cam and head swap as tbh I was still unsure in my own mind,my opinion may even change again yet
Trouble is I was testing it in bad weather and wet roads and between the injector swap and trying to setup the fuelling,boost,watch all the gauges and most importantly not crashing I was not really getting a chance to get a good feel for it.
First impressions were that maybe something was missing,it certainly does not feel the same as before but that was to be expected really.
I Was only doing 3rd and 4th gear pulls at this time as 2nd was/is unusable in the wet,and needed the higher gears to sort the fuelling which I will come to at a later date.
Anyhow I have had it out tonight with the dryer roads and given it a good beating,so the conclusion..
It idles like crap but in a cammed way, but to the untrained ear/non petrol head they would look at you car and think somethings broke/wrong
Me I am getting used to it and have grow to quite like it,its cool to hear as well as feel something different is going on under the bonnet .
For some one looking for a smooth idle I don’t think this cam is for them,from a thread I have on puntosports this is considered normal for the kent cam.
http://www.puntosports.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?129155-Kent-cam-idle
If its worse on the lower 1301cc mk1 I don’t know,but leighs mini from tc also has this cam and idles pretty much the same and I think that’s a 1372cc?
Its surprising really as on paper this is quite a mild cam and quoted as a sports cam,I also dialled in my cam to kents specs with a vernier which I checked 7 odds times with all result within 1crank degree of each other so I am pretty certain the cam timing is correct.
So if you want a smooth idle I would look elsewhere.
Here is how it idles…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wnb4yvrzMU&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nblfYHuLFms&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=2
Then from the off and early testing I felt it had lost some off boost performance, and this is true and also to be expected to some degree,how much of this is due to the different head I am using I don’t know though.
It just feels slightly flatter and less responsive to throttle inputs if you know what I mean.
Now on boost,its worth noting here that I am proberly running 2psi more boost ,now running 20psi.
At first possibly due to the difference in off boost performance I was thinking that it was feeling maybe like it was spooling later,tbh I really don’t think this is the case and its still on full boost by about 3k,if it has changed it is very minimal indeed.
It does however come on boost different than before I think,before it used to maybe feel abit more snappy and possibly give you that boost kick feeling abit more.
Now at 3k it kicks in abit smoother with not quite the same snap as before I don’t think.
Once on boost and up to maybe 3.5-3.7k it turns into a low down torquey grunt sort of pull,where as before it would sort of peak with the initial 3k boost hit then settle into a solid grunty/torquey pull.
Once at around 3.7- 4k you really start to feel the difference,the pull noticeably changes and the engine really starts to feel free and comes alive pulling a lot harder than before,before it would still be pulling the same with its soild feeling torquey pull.
After 4k the kent just feels like it continues to pull in a smooth extremely grunty fashion all the way to the 6.5-7k revs I am using,before by 5-5.5k it would noticably be starting to lose its soild pull and feel like you are working the engine hard.
I think it even sounds abit different,before in the high revs the engine would have lost it mid range torquey sound and you could/would sort of know/feel/hear that you where revving it high and working it hard.
Now its a lot less harch in the high revs and pulls with the same sort of grunty sound all the way through, with out giving you the same feeling like you beating on it or working it hard.
It almost feels and sounds like it’s a slightly larger cc engine if you get what I mean,before it would sort of be whiney or you would feel that it was a 1300cc revving high.
Hard to explain tbh but I am sure it feels different,this is what was thowing me off abit at the start I think.
Before you could really feel it, in that it would hit hard pull solid then tail off,now its all a lot more smoother,kicks in smoother and then pulls consistently harder with a torquer feeling all the way into the high revs.
At first I was maybe feeling that it had lost some of its character,but after the beating tonight it feels a lot better imo.
Though the gears feels a lot better as when driving hard it drops back into the high revs on gear changes and pulls noticeably harder than before,before like I say you knew you was beating it, now it just grunts and pulls consistently hard.
Well that’s it, obviously there are a lot of variables here as my car is running a different turbo than stock with abit more boost and also the ported head was changed at the same time.
It was also not running a stock cam to start with but an unknown most proberly tipo cam,the cam was pretty similar to a stock mk1 cam but had 9mm lift instead of the the stock 8mm lift.
Also the fuelling maybe playing apart in all this as before it was lean in the high revs where as now its slightly better.
Overall though and atm I would give it a thumbs up,although its changed the characteristics of the car abit its still perfectly drivable at low speeds and feels good imo,the main thing is proberly the rough idle for some.
If its much faster or gained much bhp its hard to tell,it certainly feels it in the high revs, and by the dry mouth and flushed face after a b road blast earily I would proberly say yes,mind you I am a pussy .
I would say for sure the torque has definatally improved though.
This post may have to be edited due to the excessive use of the word grunty
Trouble is I was testing it in bad weather and wet roads and between the injector swap and trying to setup the fuelling,boost,watch all the gauges and most importantly not crashing I was not really getting a chance to get a good feel for it.
First impressions were that maybe something was missing,it certainly does not feel the same as before but that was to be expected really.
I Was only doing 3rd and 4th gear pulls at this time as 2nd was/is unusable in the wet,and needed the higher gears to sort the fuelling which I will come to at a later date.
Anyhow I have had it out tonight with the dryer roads and given it a good beating,so the conclusion..
It idles like crap but in a cammed way, but to the untrained ear/non petrol head they would look at you car and think somethings broke/wrong
Me I am getting used to it and have grow to quite like it,its cool to hear as well as feel something different is going on under the bonnet .
For some one looking for a smooth idle I don’t think this cam is for them,from a thread I have on puntosports this is considered normal for the kent cam.
http://www.puntosports.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?129155-Kent-cam-idle
If its worse on the lower 1301cc mk1 I don’t know,but leighs mini from tc also has this cam and idles pretty much the same and I think that’s a 1372cc?
Its surprising really as on paper this is quite a mild cam and quoted as a sports cam,I also dialled in my cam to kents specs with a vernier which I checked 7 odds times with all result within 1crank degree of each other so I am pretty certain the cam timing is correct.
So if you want a smooth idle I would look elsewhere.
Here is how it idles…
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7wnb4yvrzMU&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=3
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nblfYHuLFms&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=2
Then from the off and early testing I felt it had lost some off boost performance, and this is true and also to be expected to some degree,how much of this is due to the different head I am using I don’t know though.
It just feels slightly flatter and less responsive to throttle inputs if you know what I mean.
Now on boost,its worth noting here that I am proberly running 2psi more boost ,now running 20psi.
At first possibly due to the difference in off boost performance I was thinking that it was feeling maybe like it was spooling later,tbh I really don’t think this is the case and its still on full boost by about 3k,if it has changed it is very minimal indeed.
It does however come on boost different than before I think,before it used to maybe feel abit more snappy and possibly give you that boost kick feeling abit more.
Now at 3k it kicks in abit smoother with not quite the same snap as before I don’t think.
Once on boost and up to maybe 3.5-3.7k it turns into a low down torquey grunt sort of pull,where as before it would sort of peak with the initial 3k boost hit then settle into a solid grunty/torquey pull.
Once at around 3.7- 4k you really start to feel the difference,the pull noticeably changes and the engine really starts to feel free and comes alive pulling a lot harder than before,before it would still be pulling the same with its soild feeling torquey pull.
After 4k the kent just feels like it continues to pull in a smooth extremely grunty fashion all the way to the 6.5-7k revs I am using,before by 5-5.5k it would noticably be starting to lose its soild pull and feel like you are working the engine hard.
I think it even sounds abit different,before in the high revs the engine would have lost it mid range torquey sound and you could/would sort of know/feel/hear that you where revving it high and working it hard.
Now its a lot less harch in the high revs and pulls with the same sort of grunty sound all the way through, with out giving you the same feeling like you beating on it or working it hard.
It almost feels and sounds like it’s a slightly larger cc engine if you get what I mean,before it would sort of be whiney or you would feel that it was a 1300cc revving high.
Hard to explain tbh but I am sure it feels different,this is what was thowing me off abit at the start I think.
Before you could really feel it, in that it would hit hard pull solid then tail off,now its all a lot more smoother,kicks in smoother and then pulls consistently harder with a torquer feeling all the way into the high revs.
At first I was maybe feeling that it had lost some of its character,but after the beating tonight it feels a lot better imo.
Though the gears feels a lot better as when driving hard it drops back into the high revs on gear changes and pulls noticeably harder than before,before like I say you knew you was beating it, now it just grunts and pulls consistently hard.
Well that’s it, obviously there are a lot of variables here as my car is running a different turbo than stock with abit more boost and also the ported head was changed at the same time.
It was also not running a stock cam to start with but an unknown most proberly tipo cam,the cam was pretty similar to a stock mk1 cam but had 9mm lift instead of the the stock 8mm lift.
Also the fuelling maybe playing apart in all this as before it was lean in the high revs where as now its slightly better.
Overall though and atm I would give it a thumbs up,although its changed the characteristics of the car abit its still perfectly drivable at low speeds and feels good imo,the main thing is proberly the rough idle for some.
If its much faster or gained much bhp its hard to tell,it certainly feels it in the high revs, and by the dry mouth and flushed face after a b road blast earily I would proberly say yes,mind you I am a pussy .
I would say for sure the torque has definatally improved though.
This post may have to be edited due to the excessive use of the word grunty
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Well i manged to get a couple of small clips of how its running since the changes,trouble is it all went tits up with the camara and was to dark really to be filming .
The quality is absolutly terrible,my worst yet :lol:and had to get youtube to enhance the brightness as it was to dark to see anything before really
Test performed on a private road
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPaP355BDFo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXt3T7ZlVHM
The quality is absolutly terrible,my worst yet :lol:and had to get youtube to enhance the brightness as it was to dark to see anything before really
Test performed on a private road
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vPaP355BDFo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXt3T7ZlVHM
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
excellant, keep it it up
did you manage to get it so it doesnt run lean in the high rpms?
did you manage to get it so it doesnt run lean in the high rpms?
st1allstar- Over boosting
- Posts : 539
Join date : 2013-03-01
Age : 39
Location : west mids
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Sadly no,infact i have dropped my limiter to 6500rpm in an effort to run it abit safer this time,but even at 6.5k its still to lean to be classed as safe tbh.
It is however 10 times better than it was,before it was infact abit more than just dodgy lean and was actually stupid lean as can be seen by my headgasket i think i was lucky i did not melt the pistons
As above though,once the afr gauge was out and "see no evil hear no evil"and that it felt like it was running good dont mean its alright
I was also going from my first uno abit aswell and the abuse it took,and just thought this one feels ok on less boost and the old one was ok and did not blow up,wrong...
I was just reading though an old post i done on turbo124...
Quote
So to the running lean,as soon as I get near 5-6k+ (around the same revs that the boost creeps at)in any gear it starts leaning out to 13-14-15 and even 16 afr I have seen!
That just reads trouble
I knew it was not right and like i say i pushed my luck due to the above.
Even at 0.9- 1bar boost the thing would still lean up the same so it wernt just a case of running to much boost,although it was proberly a factor
To make matters worse after the head and cam swap and still using the stock injectors the car would now be running dodgy lean by 4k and hitting around 13afr so i was getting worryed at getting the punto ones to work at this point.
Anyhow i am no expert at this as can be seen by my head gasket but my understanding of good on boost fuelling is something like this..
Ideal would be around 11.5-12.1 with 11.5 being on the safe side, no lower than 11 as its getting rich and 12.5 max lean but may be considered to lean on some cars running poor fuel or loads of ignition advance.
Orginally my car was something like a quick 10.5 to 10.8 dip coming on boost under heavy load to a good 11.6 on boost until around 5k then it would start to lean rapidly and probely hit 13-14's by 5.7-6k and just got worse from there very quickly,but i choose to ignore this once the guage was out as it felt ok
Now with the punto injectors heavy load low revs coming on boost it will dip as low as 10.3 then to low 11's on boost at 3k ish and from there it will progressivly get leaner the higher the revs.
I think around 11.5 at about 4k leaning to 11.8-12 by around 5.5k then 6k 12.3-12.5 and 6.5k 13-13.1 7k 13.5+
13 is abit dodgy still tbh but as can be seen alot better than it was lol ,but i have dropped the limiter in a small effort to help it,once again i am going on faith abit to that it wont blow up but i think my chances are alot better this time,i hope...
I could quite easyly get it with more fuel pressure but it would run way to rich low down and on light cruise,its to rich now really with the 10.3 but that is like loading it up low down in 5th,average is 10.5- 10.8 from just stabbing it, still rich but wont hurt it i dont think.
I am right in the middle of it atm imo at keeping it sensible though out the rev range.
What i had read about the unos mapping is pretty much spot on i think,i think it runs more fuel/ abit rich coming on boost and around max torque 3-3.5k then levels/leans out abit and then starts leaning the fuelling after 5k so i have had to work around this.
Its not completly without its problems though,my afm seems to have some funky assed issues where it gets the a wiggle on and will hang there and run rich
Not sure why tbh but it obviosly connected to adjusting the afm spring tension,must/may be some frequency imbalence or something with the in coming air and spring tension.
The spring dont feel excessivly tight imo and is only around 9-10 teeth tighter than stock,i may try a larger inlet pipe,not sure yet.
The cam may also be connected to it but am unsure atm,i know the idle is a bit lopey with the cam and it makes slightly less vacuum than it used to,god knows
This problem can basicly stop it coming back to idle properly and make the revs hang at 1.5kish.
Its alot worse with a sealed system,ie no open bleed valve,i was trying to use a dawes device mbc which is sort of sealed with not bleeding the air to control the boost.
This is good for my idle afr and will hold a spot on 14.7 afr when idling and also at off boost cruise,trouble is the above and the fact that this dawes mbc dont work at all well on my car,infact its bloody crap at controlling my boost and i have tryed alsorts,god knows why.
So back to the good old bleed valve,this improves the afm issues loads but is due to the fact as its basicly acting as a vacuum leak in the inlet pipe at idle,i can feel it sucking air when idleing.
The down side to this is that it then makes it run a pretty lean 15-17+afr idle where its sucking air and also makes the cam lope sound worse.
Then on light off boost cruise it seems to make it run slightly richer at around 13.5-13.7 which aint bad but 14.7 was better lol
It does seem to control the boost real well though,perfect 19-20psi all the way through with maybe a tiny bit of creep right up top.
Here is the afm issue,this is with the dawes mbc...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3TTVbos7uY&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=3
Part throttle and part throttle on bosst seem ok,which i think can be anywhere from high 12's to high 11;s depending on boost throttle etc
Its proberly alround a little bit rich to be fair up until 6k-6.5k but is safe up until then and alot better than before imo.
I do miss the revs abit if i am honest though as i like beating a car but really the only place i miss it the most is in second,it reasonably low geared and i find that 2nd is the only gear where i feel i could get a better jump to the next gear from more revs.
It still good imo but feels it could be quicker with a few more revs there,3rd to 4th is great and 4th to 5th is good aswell,if anything 5th could be slightly taller.
I am happy where i am but i will proberly be going top change at some point so am wondering what that will do.
Not looked into it yet but am hoping the gearing might be slightly longer,not sure as i say i am quite happy,hope the top change dont change it to much,.
Overall though i am really happy with it atm, if it dont blow up the cam has made a real big difference imo,the more i drive it the more i like it .
The idle is also certainly lumpy but i have grown to like it,the only thing that has proberly changed for the worse is it can also be abit rough from off idle to maybe 1750rpm or so/very light low rev cruising.
Not to much of a problem really but it dont have the feeling that you could pull away in any gear like it used to if you get what i mean lol,and you can sort of feel that it would be jerky if you tryed ,but this is to be expected i surpose.
Though the revs though its great imo,i think it even sounds different/better but if that in my head i dont know lol
So thats it and happy days!
Well other than other issues i have/had with leaks and more interestingly a helicoiled plug hole running a spark plug to hot but that for another day to update
And just for future reference mainly for me incase i forget its running around 2.5-2.6 bar base fuel pressure and 9-10 teeth on the afm.
It is however 10 times better than it was,before it was infact abit more than just dodgy lean and was actually stupid lean as can be seen by my headgasket i think i was lucky i did not melt the pistons
As above though,once the afr gauge was out and "see no evil hear no evil"and that it felt like it was running good dont mean its alright
I was also going from my first uno abit aswell and the abuse it took,and just thought this one feels ok on less boost and the old one was ok and did not blow up,wrong...
I was just reading though an old post i done on turbo124...
Quote
So to the running lean,as soon as I get near 5-6k+ (around the same revs that the boost creeps at)in any gear it starts leaning out to 13-14-15 and even 16 afr I have seen!
That just reads trouble
I knew it was not right and like i say i pushed my luck due to the above.
Even at 0.9- 1bar boost the thing would still lean up the same so it wernt just a case of running to much boost,although it was proberly a factor
To make matters worse after the head and cam swap and still using the stock injectors the car would now be running dodgy lean by 4k and hitting around 13afr so i was getting worryed at getting the punto ones to work at this point.
Anyhow i am no expert at this as can be seen by my head gasket but my understanding of good on boost fuelling is something like this..
Ideal would be around 11.5-12.1 with 11.5 being on the safe side, no lower than 11 as its getting rich and 12.5 max lean but may be considered to lean on some cars running poor fuel or loads of ignition advance.
Orginally my car was something like a quick 10.5 to 10.8 dip coming on boost under heavy load to a good 11.6 on boost until around 5k then it would start to lean rapidly and probely hit 13-14's by 5.7-6k and just got worse from there very quickly,but i choose to ignore this once the guage was out as it felt ok
Now with the punto injectors heavy load low revs coming on boost it will dip as low as 10.3 then to low 11's on boost at 3k ish and from there it will progressivly get leaner the higher the revs.
I think around 11.5 at about 4k leaning to 11.8-12 by around 5.5k then 6k 12.3-12.5 and 6.5k 13-13.1 7k 13.5+
13 is abit dodgy still tbh but as can be seen alot better than it was lol ,but i have dropped the limiter in a small effort to help it,once again i am going on faith abit to that it wont blow up but i think my chances are alot better this time,i hope...
I could quite easyly get it with more fuel pressure but it would run way to rich low down and on light cruise,its to rich now really with the 10.3 but that is like loading it up low down in 5th,average is 10.5- 10.8 from just stabbing it, still rich but wont hurt it i dont think.
I am right in the middle of it atm imo at keeping it sensible though out the rev range.
What i had read about the unos mapping is pretty much spot on i think,i think it runs more fuel/ abit rich coming on boost and around max torque 3-3.5k then levels/leans out abit and then starts leaning the fuelling after 5k so i have had to work around this.
Its not completly without its problems though,my afm seems to have some funky assed issues where it gets the a wiggle on and will hang there and run rich
Not sure why tbh but it obviosly connected to adjusting the afm spring tension,must/may be some frequency imbalence or something with the in coming air and spring tension.
The spring dont feel excessivly tight imo and is only around 9-10 teeth tighter than stock,i may try a larger inlet pipe,not sure yet.
The cam may also be connected to it but am unsure atm,i know the idle is a bit lopey with the cam and it makes slightly less vacuum than it used to,god knows
This problem can basicly stop it coming back to idle properly and make the revs hang at 1.5kish.
Its alot worse with a sealed system,ie no open bleed valve,i was trying to use a dawes device mbc which is sort of sealed with not bleeding the air to control the boost.
This is good for my idle afr and will hold a spot on 14.7 afr when idling and also at off boost cruise,trouble is the above and the fact that this dawes mbc dont work at all well on my car,infact its bloody crap at controlling my boost and i have tryed alsorts,god knows why.
So back to the good old bleed valve,this improves the afm issues loads but is due to the fact as its basicly acting as a vacuum leak in the inlet pipe at idle,i can feel it sucking air when idleing.
The down side to this is that it then makes it run a pretty lean 15-17+afr idle where its sucking air and also makes the cam lope sound worse.
Then on light off boost cruise it seems to make it run slightly richer at around 13.5-13.7 which aint bad but 14.7 was better lol
It does seem to control the boost real well though,perfect 19-20psi all the way through with maybe a tiny bit of creep right up top.
Here is the afm issue,this is with the dawes mbc...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n3TTVbos7uY&list=UUsvg6ZX6X-ILPOR4VBpX7mQ&index=3
Part throttle and part throttle on bosst seem ok,which i think can be anywhere from high 12's to high 11;s depending on boost throttle etc
Its proberly alround a little bit rich to be fair up until 6k-6.5k but is safe up until then and alot better than before imo.
I do miss the revs abit if i am honest though as i like beating a car but really the only place i miss it the most is in second,it reasonably low geared and i find that 2nd is the only gear where i feel i could get a better jump to the next gear from more revs.
It still good imo but feels it could be quicker with a few more revs there,3rd to 4th is great and 4th to 5th is good aswell,if anything 5th could be slightly taller.
I am happy where i am but i will proberly be going top change at some point so am wondering what that will do.
Not looked into it yet but am hoping the gearing might be slightly longer,not sure as i say i am quite happy,hope the top change dont change it to much,.
Overall though i am really happy with it atm, if it dont blow up the cam has made a real big difference imo,the more i drive it the more i like it .
The idle is also certainly lumpy but i have grown to like it,the only thing that has proberly changed for the worse is it can also be abit rough from off idle to maybe 1750rpm or so/very light low rev cruising.
Not to much of a problem really but it dont have the feeling that you could pull away in any gear like it used to if you get what i mean lol,and you can sort of feel that it would be jerky if you tryed ,but this is to be expected i surpose.
Though the revs though its great imo,i think it even sounds different/better but if that in my head i dont know lol
So thats it and happy days!
Well other than other issues i have/had with leaks and more interestingly a helicoiled plug hole running a spark plug to hot but that for another day to update
And just for future reference mainly for me incase i forget its running around 2.5-2.6 bar base fuel pressure and 9-10 teeth on the afm.
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
That shell is incredibly clean. Very nicely done too.
Tayto.king- 4th gear
- Posts : 171
Join date : 2013-01-29
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Ok quick update.
Silicone and cork sump gasket was am epic fail so i ended up buying a rubber one from ebay.
The rubber jobby is alot better for torqueing up and overall alot better than the cork shite, although i do still have a bloody leak at the front corner .
Its not in the joins that you glue but just around the corner abit,hoping that it will be 3rd time lucky though .
When i do it again at some point i will have a better check of my sump for flatness, but getting hacked of with it though tbh .
Couple of new bits, one being the ebay rad hoses from the other thread and i have also made myself a larger intake pipe.
The plan behind the intake pipe was to see if it would cure my afm wobble problem but unfortunataly it aint
Only driven it once since and i think its pretty much still the same,possibly slightly better, not 100% just sure yet.
Looks like i am proberly going to have to live with it though,its pretty easy to drive around really but is still bloody annoying none the less, especially as i dont completly know what is causing it
The intake pipe also did not come out quite how i envisioned .
The bend at the top of the stock pipe is neither a 45 or 90 degree but somewhere in the middle.
This made it tricky to get it to fit right especially as its tight for space down there,which is obviosly less than an ideal situation
The top 45degree bend that i used ended up looking abit angled ,but other than that its in there and fits pretty well considering.
I was alittle concerned about it imploding lol, but it seems fine tbh.
It has a alloy pipe down most of it spine so it only the ends to worry about, i think the afm and filter are free flowing enough so dont think it will be a problem.
The original pipe is 60mm off the afm then drops straight down to 45mm,i have gone for 60mm all the way then down to 45mm at the turbo.
Dont really think its much of a power adder but was fitted mainly to see if it would cure the afm,which it did not
Anyhow it will be staying,if anything i may have gained abit more induction noise
Silicone and cork sump gasket was am epic fail so i ended up buying a rubber one from ebay.
The rubber jobby is alot better for torqueing up and overall alot better than the cork shite, although i do still have a bloody leak at the front corner .
Its not in the joins that you glue but just around the corner abit,hoping that it will be 3rd time lucky though .
When i do it again at some point i will have a better check of my sump for flatness, but getting hacked of with it though tbh .
Couple of new bits, one being the ebay rad hoses from the other thread and i have also made myself a larger intake pipe.
The plan behind the intake pipe was to see if it would cure my afm wobble problem but unfortunataly it aint
Only driven it once since and i think its pretty much still the same,possibly slightly better, not 100% just sure yet.
Looks like i am proberly going to have to live with it though,its pretty easy to drive around really but is still bloody annoying none the less, especially as i dont completly know what is causing it
The intake pipe also did not come out quite how i envisioned .
The bend at the top of the stock pipe is neither a 45 or 90 degree but somewhere in the middle.
This made it tricky to get it to fit right especially as its tight for space down there,which is obviosly less than an ideal situation
The top 45degree bend that i used ended up looking abit angled ,but other than that its in there and fits pretty well considering.
I was alittle concerned about it imploding lol, but it seems fine tbh.
It has a alloy pipe down most of it spine so it only the ends to worry about, i think the afm and filter are free flowing enough so dont think it will be a problem.
The original pipe is 60mm off the afm then drops straight down to 45mm,i have gone for 60mm all the way then down to 45mm at the turbo.
Dont really think its much of a power adder but was fitted mainly to see if it would cure the afm,which it did not
Anyhow it will be staying,if anything i may have gained abit more induction noise
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
looks good mate what you done with the breather pipe do you fancy selling the standard intake pipe as need one for mine as its split
Last edited by robr33gts on Fri Mar 22, 2013 7:50 am; edited 1 time in total
robr33gts- Over boosting
- Posts : 518
Join date : 2013-01-27
Age : 48
Location : lincoln
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
those pipes do look good mate
doody- 5th gear
- Posts : 316
Join date : 2013-02-04
Age : 48
Location : crowland
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Well a quick update,with some being good and some being bad.
First up is i managed to get the uno back on a dyno again, and if i am honest i would have to say i was a little disapointed
The car made pretty much the same power if not a little less than it did before!
It was also not making as much boost as i though and is still apparentally only making around 18psi-18.5psi which is pretty much the same as i was told it was making when i had the first dyno run at santa pod,even though my gauge says different.
The afr graph was also not as i expected, but i have a feeling that his gauge may have been off as others mentioned this aswell on the day,it says i was under 10's until 5100rpm which is not even close to what mine reads.
I am not going to moan to much because i could go on for hours although i do have my douts on both the dynos that i have run on
I am not douting the over all power figures to much but on the first dyno at santa pod the bhp and torque did not cross at 5252rpm like it should of and the more recent dyno which tbh i have alot more faith in (other than the afr graph) i still have a sneaky feeling the rpm scaling on the run was out.
Like i say i could go on forever here but at the end of the day i am more than happy with how the car runs and tbh its not often i would say that about one of my cars
Also imo i would swear its faster now than it was,also the mates i have taken in it feel the same,but as above deep down i am happy so am not to concerned about the fiqures.
Santa pod graph is here...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=398130&page=19
And the latest one can be found in this thread at the bottom of the graphs...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=446999
The latest one makes it look laggy as hell, and you also may notice that the power was made at above 6500rpm where my limiter is set which is also what my rev counter reads to when on the limiter at 6500rpm,the car did not hit the rev limiter on the runs and imo was not that close to hitting it either.
I will also try and post up the boost graph at some point but thats saying i am hitting full boost above 4k,infact 4100-4500rpm full boost,i know the dyno will read a little later than what you see on the road but in 4th i am on full boost at 3k-3.2k at the very latest.
You could possibly point at the cam moving everything to the right but once again which is just my opinion i think the rev scaling on the dyno was possibly around 650rpm+ out.
Anyhow i said i was not going to moan
Theres a couple of pics in this thread...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=441160&page=16
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=441160&page=17
Then on the way home i got into a jingle with a scooby,not really played with much if i am honest so far and after the dissapointing dyno i though lets have it
Was doing really well, infact it was not going no where until a rather harsh 3rd to 4th change and my clutch started slipping,i was still hanging on but my clutch wernt
Long story short my clutch is now fooked,it will slip bad most times coming on boost in 3rd,4th and 5th
It was only just hanging on before and would slip a tiny bit now and again with gentaler gear changes,driving it hard between gears has finished it off.
I am now needing to look into a punto gt clutch and flywheel swap and need to find out if i will need to change the starter aswell?
Then to the good news
It passed its mot
It has also been doing 80+ odd mile a day this last week and has been faultless other than the clutch,it always brings a smile to my face getting into it and driving it home
Cant say the same about the mpg i have been getting though which is proberly around 25-30 at best,i struggle to keep it off boost on the motorway at 70 which is killing it i think where its abit richer than the norm,saying that i dont think it done much better before the injector swap.
Bloody fuel prices aswell,i managed to get something like £60 of vpower in it the other day and it only has a 42liter tank i think ,mind you it was on the light.
First up is i managed to get the uno back on a dyno again, and if i am honest i would have to say i was a little disapointed
The car made pretty much the same power if not a little less than it did before!
It was also not making as much boost as i though and is still apparentally only making around 18psi-18.5psi which is pretty much the same as i was told it was making when i had the first dyno run at santa pod,even though my gauge says different.
The afr graph was also not as i expected, but i have a feeling that his gauge may have been off as others mentioned this aswell on the day,it says i was under 10's until 5100rpm which is not even close to what mine reads.
I am not going to moan to much because i could go on for hours although i do have my douts on both the dynos that i have run on
I am not douting the over all power figures to much but on the first dyno at santa pod the bhp and torque did not cross at 5252rpm like it should of and the more recent dyno which tbh i have alot more faith in (other than the afr graph) i still have a sneaky feeling the rpm scaling on the run was out.
Like i say i could go on forever here but at the end of the day i am more than happy with how the car runs and tbh its not often i would say that about one of my cars
Also imo i would swear its faster now than it was,also the mates i have taken in it feel the same,but as above deep down i am happy so am not to concerned about the fiqures.
Santa pod graph is here...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=398130&page=19
And the latest one can be found in this thread at the bottom of the graphs...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=446999
The latest one makes it look laggy as hell, and you also may notice that the power was made at above 6500rpm where my limiter is set which is also what my rev counter reads to when on the limiter at 6500rpm,the car did not hit the rev limiter on the runs and imo was not that close to hitting it either.
I will also try and post up the boost graph at some point but thats saying i am hitting full boost above 4k,infact 4100-4500rpm full boost,i know the dyno will read a little later than what you see on the road but in 4th i am on full boost at 3k-3.2k at the very latest.
You could possibly point at the cam moving everything to the right but once again which is just my opinion i think the rev scaling on the dyno was possibly around 650rpm+ out.
Anyhow i said i was not going to moan
Theres a couple of pics in this thread...
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=441160&page=16
http://www.lancerregister.com/showthread.php?t=441160&page=17
Then on the way home i got into a jingle with a scooby,not really played with much if i am honest so far and after the dissapointing dyno i though lets have it
Was doing really well, infact it was not going no where until a rather harsh 3rd to 4th change and my clutch started slipping,i was still hanging on but my clutch wernt
Long story short my clutch is now fooked,it will slip bad most times coming on boost in 3rd,4th and 5th
It was only just hanging on before and would slip a tiny bit now and again with gentaler gear changes,driving it hard between gears has finished it off.
I am now needing to look into a punto gt clutch and flywheel swap and need to find out if i will need to change the starter aswell?
Then to the good news
It passed its mot
It has also been doing 80+ odd mile a day this last week and has been faultless other than the clutch,it always brings a smile to my face getting into it and driving it home
Cant say the same about the mpg i have been getting though which is proberly around 25-30 at best,i struggle to keep it off boost on the motorway at 70 which is killing it i think where its abit richer than the norm,saying that i dont think it done much better before the injector swap.
Bloody fuel prices aswell,i managed to get something like £60 of vpower in it the other day and it only has a 42liter tank i think ,mind you it was on the light.
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
do you plan on doing anything else for more power?
you dont need to change the starter motor when fitting the pgt clutch
you dont need to change the starter motor when fitting the pgt clutch
st1allstar- Over boosting
- Posts : 539
Join date : 2013-03-01
Age : 39
Location : west mids
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Nah thats it now,i am genuinly really happy with how it runs atm and its not often i would say that as you always want more lol.
Atm it seems a nice balence for what i am after ,and its certainly not slow imo and always makes me smile when driving it.
I dont know if its the placebo effect but the cam has made the car for me,it feels alot more soild imo and just grunts instead of screams on boost now.
I will admit it has made it abit rough/twitchy below 2k though,but i have grow to love the lumpy idle.
As long as it dont go pop i am happy,but if does end up killing the headgasket again or pistons i will have to consider aftermarker managment and thats when i will push for more,fingers crossed though it should be ok!
Atm it seems a nice balence for what i am after ,and its certainly not slow imo and always makes me smile when driving it.
I dont know if its the placebo effect but the cam has made the car for me,it feels alot more soild imo and just grunts instead of screams on boost now.
I will admit it has made it abit rough/twitchy below 2k though,but i have grow to love the lumpy idle.
As long as it dont go pop i am happy,but if does end up killing the headgasket again or pistons i will have to consider aftermarker managment and thats when i will push for more,fingers crossed though it should be ok!
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
thats good then, are you going to be going the retro show? i shall be taking mine this year defo
st1allstar- Over boosting
- Posts : 539
Join date : 2013-03-01
Age : 39
Location : west mids
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Yeah hopefully i just need to sort this clutch and the gearbox but i am on the case as we speak.
Thing is dunc aint on here atm i dont think and he was the one that sorted the stand for the retro show,when i last looked on facebook he looked like he was getting pissed with unos and had an engine problem so am not sure whats going to happen.
I will look into it closer to the time if duncs not about to see if we can get enough interest and a stand/spot to park.
Thing is dunc aint on here atm i dont think and he was the one that sorted the stand for the retro show,when i last looked on facebook he looked like he was getting pissed with unos and had an engine problem so am not sure whats going to happen.
I will look into it closer to the time if duncs not about to see if we can get enough interest and a stand/spot to park.
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
any updates?
st1allstar- Over boosting
- Posts : 539
Join date : 2013-03-01
Age : 39
Location : west mids
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
st1allstar wrote:any updates?
In bits again
Changing to a top change box and fitting the lightened and balenced punto gt flywheel and clutch i had brought,have also done the rose joint linkage mod.
Not running yet but think it should work,although i did have to grind off a small part of the box to get it to fit.
Also stil fighting with that weeping sump gasket
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Well not really much of an update as I have basicly done nothing to it
Infact all I have done is neglect it
Its been washed only once this year (last week ) and been abused on a daily basis.
The interior and engine bay are also now looking abit sorry for its self as its spent a lot of its time parked in a sand quarry lol.
The old rotter has done me well though and clocked up over 14k now since it was built and not really missed a beat,it even flew though its mot the other week
Its certainly been fun harassing the daily traffic but I think soon that she may have to retire from the daily grind in favour of something more economical.
Shame really as I built it to be a daily but at the time I was not doing 60-80 miles a day.
I am also feeling that its only a matter of time before I possibly get into a bad crash in the thing as I have had more than the one close call on the motorway due to shite traffic/drivers.
Just the other month there was a close call on a slip road where the 2 cars in front of me locked up due to unseen stopped traffic,and even though I thought I had left adequate space that was obviously not the case as I went sailing up the inside of the back car stopping level with his passenger door.
We sort of both gave each other a knowing wave that yes I to have just stained my pants
Not sure what the future holds for it atm although it certainly wont be going any where,proberly just end up a weekend car or get pulled out of the garage on the mornings that I am running late lol
Infact all I have done is neglect it
Its been washed only once this year (last week ) and been abused on a daily basis.
The interior and engine bay are also now looking abit sorry for its self as its spent a lot of its time parked in a sand quarry lol.
The old rotter has done me well though and clocked up over 14k now since it was built and not really missed a beat,it even flew though its mot the other week
Its certainly been fun harassing the daily traffic but I think soon that she may have to retire from the daily grind in favour of something more economical.
Shame really as I built it to be a daily but at the time I was not doing 60-80 miles a day.
I am also feeling that its only a matter of time before I possibly get into a bad crash in the thing as I have had more than the one close call on the motorway due to shite traffic/drivers.
Just the other month there was a close call on a slip road where the 2 cars in front of me locked up due to unseen stopped traffic,and even though I thought I had left adequate space that was obviously not the case as I went sailing up the inside of the back car stopping level with his passenger door.
We sort of both gave each other a knowing wave that yes I to have just stained my pants
Not sure what the future holds for it atm although it certainly wont be going any where,proberly just end up a weekend car or get pulled out of the garage on the mornings that I am running late lol
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
Yeah keep it as a weekend toy Rich, its toooo nice to be used as a daily:(
hakydan- 4th gear
- Posts : 113
Join date : 2013-01-30
Re: Mk1 uno turbo blue reshell
deffo weekend toy
Any up to dat pics of how its looking now? Before you clean it back up to its former glory?
Dunc
Any up to dat pics of how its looking now? Before you clean it back up to its former glory?
Dunc
Dunc- 4th gear
- Posts : 160
Join date : 2013-04-03
Page 1 of 2 • 1, 2
Similar topics
» my mk1 reshell project
» MK2 Turbo Reshell project on Ebay
» ONYX KIT CAR BLUE PRINTED TURBO
» Blue MK2 Uno turbo on Ebay £2400
» Fiat Uno Turbo Mk1 Delphi Blue NOW BREAKING!(sold)
» MK2 Turbo Reshell project on Ebay
» ONYX KIT CAR BLUE PRINTED TURBO
» Blue MK2 Uno turbo on Ebay £2400
» Fiat Uno Turbo Mk1 Delphi Blue NOW BREAKING!(sold)
Page 1 of 2
Permissions in this forum:
You cannot reply to topics in this forum